Of real estate (registration, registration and assessment) of amending law of 2025 and the budget of the Central Authority of Equal Law Distribution of 2025
In the House of Representatives, there are two laws on Thursday, of the real estate (registration, registration and assessment) of an amending law of 2025 and the budget of the central equal distribution of the 2025 heavy heavyweight.
The rivals were discussed by the Parliamentary Committee of Refugees.
Concerning the real estate (registration, registration and assessment) of amending law of 2025, the members of the Commission reacted to the proposal of the Legal Service such as the approximately 40 refugees who built a land in which it was indicated by the state after the invasion to be examined by its own criteria. There and where there are refugees who reside in state land depending on their data remaining for life and their children can request and benefit from relevant plans, the Legal Service spokesman said.
They also reacted to what was said by the Ministry of the Interior that these property, in which their homes have built refugees, are much greater value and there is plenty of inequality between refugees.
The reaction concerns the law that amendes the real estate (registration, registration and assessment) law, which allows the Council of Ministers to approve the alienation of state land for housing or self -esteem as a result of the Turkish invasion, even if it has not been described as a government. The law was passed on March 6, 2025.
The legal service spokesman told the Commission that the House decision to amend this law would intervene in the authority of the Council of Ministers on the disposal of state land.
Giving power to the Council of Ministers to legalize cases that do not have the approval of the state also intervenes in the state’s housing policy, he said, among other things. He noted that there are other ways that the House could see these 40 cases to have a concession rather than alienation of state land for as long as these people are alive in order not to give another dimension and to create the issue of another speed refugees in a way that can benefit from illegality.
The interior ministry spokesman told the Commission that the Ministry has proposed a series of epilogies to these refugees, such as being transferred either to settlements and elsewhere, but had not been accepted. He noted that the state is not intended to expel people from their homes, although there are court rulings that they are illegal and that the purpose is to remain for life. Their heirs, he said, can request and benefit from one of the state plans.
Commission President Nikos Ketiros said the President of the Republic should “stop wondering” because refugees are forced to sell their possessions in the occupied territories. “We behave with analgesia, it cannot be arguments that this is fillets,” he said. “We were expecting the President of the Republic to stand politically and we are waiting for the plenary to think again,” he said.
DISY MP Rita Superman noted that the humanitarian issue is coming to the middle, “a matter that has remained unsolved for 50 years,” he said, noting that he should be resolved in favor of refugees and not in favor of the state.
AKEL MP and Deputy Chairman of the Commission, Christos Christofides, said at the meeting that the issue “is purely political” and noted that the government could not say that a refugee who re-acquired his home after an invasion of a place that he was told by the government. “It is unacceptable to tell us that the refugees built into fillets and have to move from there, this is tragic,” he said.
AKEL MP Christos Christofias said that “it would be much more honorable to tell us that it is because it is a fillet” rather than to sculpt anything else. If it were in a village, this legislation would be signed, he noted.
Zacharias Koulias, a MP of DIKO, said there is no doubt that the committee’s attempt was to help the state resolve the issue of these 40 cases of people who built with the assistance and assistance of the state, “and which will not be repeated or existed”. He noted that all the settlements “became fillets”. “We give the government an opportunity to think about it,” he said.
‘Delay of budget deposit, risk of payment attitude’
The Commission also discussed the release of the 2025 Central Body Budget Budget with its chairman, Mr Ketiros, expressing the position that when there is a delay by the executive to submit budgets, the danger of “remains” the risk of “the risk of” the risk. Responsibility for this, he said, would “bring the executive power”.
He noted that the budget of the body was filed before the House around the end of February and that it was discussed the following day and was sent to the plenary for voting.
The release of the President of the Republic, as told by the Commission, the Legal Service’s representative focuses on the 2nd amendment on the amount given to subsidy for the interest rate – € 16,700,000 – if not the whole is spent to be transferred to the Central Body’s reserve to apply additional support plans. He noted that the purpose of the expenditure is explicitly given as sponsorship for subsidy for the interest rate without any other purpose.
The Treasury spokesman assured members of the committee that the ministry consult with the body that any additional amount needed, this is incorporated into the state budget.
Asked by Mr Christofides if the body will be left without a budget in the event that the House insisted and referred to the Supreme Court, the Legal Service spokesman said that he would not be signed by the President of the Republic and the budget law would not be published.
Source: KYPE