The prosecutor of the Joint Circuit Court of Appeal Andreas Karaflos requested the acquittal of doubts and for the second category of attempted rape.
And in the second case, Mr Karaflos said he was suffering from a complete lack of undoubted evidence, such as a forensic report.
According to the prosecutor, the second complainant’s deposition is characterized by unreliability.
The prosecutor said that in this second case that is burdened by Philippides, we do not only have “most doubts” but we have “more of the most doubts”, adding that “things are worse here than the first case.”
As he said, “both cases do not have the festive element of proof: Forensic report”, while stressing that the whole case is two deposits, those of the two women.
“If you accept them as accurate, unquestionable then condemn!” told the judges.
And in this complaint, the prosecutor identified 26 contradictions and serious issues in the complainant’s allegations. Referring to one by one, Mr Karaflos emphasized that the complainant has not identified which of Philippides’ cars, which would solve many issues regarding the central lock and others.
“We don’t know what a car it had. How do you try without the crime place? How will we try? How will we check? What are we? Butcher? ” He noted, and shortly afterwards he said: “Here, we are looking for the details to try or acquit. How to condemn? Why do the channels want it? I don’t work like that, ”he said.
Another serious issue identified by the prosecutor concerns the place of crime in Psychiko, which the complainant mentions as a dead end dirt road and as a plot. In any case, according to Mr. Karaflos, the time and point of the incident, opposite the house of the accused “does not stand”. As he said: “Such violence in common view, opposite his home, does not stand in common sense. We violate open doors. “
Elsewhere, the prosecutor always pointed out the complainant that her reactions, after escaping the accused, are not in line with something so serious.
“She had a cellphone with her. You get out of the car. Take a photo of the car to catch Leventis. So when the rapist is known to do nothing? If such things are going to the police, “she said, noting that the same night the complainant played in a performance, that she wrote nothing in her diary and did not inform her own.
And in this case, Mr Karaflos said he did not see a hurry to the accused. “His whole sexual image as the complainant presents to us is that he is in ecstasy with closed eyes and masturbates. The defendant likes self -satisfaction, with the fantasy that the woman is shouting. It does not refer to rapist but to someone who likes to masturbate with the image of a dependent, trapped woman, “she said.
The prosecutor urged the court to deal with his conference with “what both complainants say in the SEI, what changes have been made below”. “Pay a lot of attention! Neither with the complainant, so did things, ”he said.
Concluding his speech, reading an excerpt from the author Pascal Bruckner, on the occasion of Metoo’s complaints, the prosecutor urged “see and the problems he creates”.
Source: RES – EIA